| 'Action research'
and a VET framework of innovation
CONTRIBUTIONS
The
contributions held at the round table were based on the papers presented
below, which are available for downloading from the VETNET
website.
Elly
de Bruijn & Anneke Westerhuis
Developing
practical theory on competence based training in the Netherlands
Paper
CINOP
is developing its own approach to knowledge production in connection with
innovative practice in organisations. Projects have been organised so as
to develop both new theories and new practice. Projects or groups of projects
have organised in a dual bond wherein the development of new practices
produces ‘Mode 2’ knowledge (Gibson et al 1994). This ‘Mode 2’ (local)
knowledge can, however, be combined and organised as general concepts -
in practical theories. Such theories are not blueprints; they offer validated
concepts and a repertoire for practical action consisting of corresponding
components: first, a system/model of connected statements, considerations
and concepts in relation to a specific field (learning and training in
VET); second, a set of instruments and action repertoires, consistent with
the model, for all relevant actors (teachers, students, mangers, trainers,
companies); third, tools and instruments to implement model and action
strategies in specific contexts, relevant within the field (eg, a department
in a Regional Vocational College). This methodological approach has been
practised since 2002 in an innovation programme on competence based training.
Its implications for the process, whereby educational practice gains from
educational theory and research and vice versa, will be discussed.
Ludger
Deitmer
Action
Research in pilot projects - Interaction between VET practitioners and
researchers for innovation and research
Paper
Presentation
(MSPowerPoint slides)
The
main theme of this contribution will be to what extend innovative changes
in VET-institutions and on professionals can be supported by action research
in terms of “Begleitforschung” (accompanying research). Within the BLK
programme 22 VET school pilot projects experimented under the programme
umbrella and made use of theory-practise interaction between: VET teachers
taking part in the pilot project, accompanying VET researchers in the pilots
itself and as well as the programme team based at the ITB, University of
Bremen. The intention of this action oriented research and development
programme was to develop curricula with a new quality of occupational action
competencies; and following up holistic and self-directed learning arrangements.
Outcomes and effects of these change processes were evaluated by action
research tools. The contribution aims at reflecting on the relevance of
this action research approach: Where are the specific strengths and weaknesses
of the action approach? How far did the instruments do they job? What kind
of conclusions can be made for the European discussion and the OECD (see
above) notion?. The programme evaluation concept is novel and was recently
tested in the European research arena (Fetterman, Kaftarian, and Wandersmann
1996; Nyhan, Attwell, Deitmer 1999; Manske et.al. 2002; COVOSECO, 2004).
Pekka
Kämäräinen
The
role of ‘action research’, ‘accompanying research’ and ‘evaluation research’
in European research on vocational education and training (VET) - Reflections
on efforts to develop a common European VET research culture
Paper
(available
soon)
This
article tries to promote methodological reflection on action-oriented and
co-participative research designs that are relevant for the development
of European research culture in the field of vocational education and training
(VET). On the one hand the article draws upon different evolutionary developments
in national research cultures that have either promoted or sidelined the
consolidation of such research methodologies. On the other hand the article
is related to the parallel development of programme frameworks for European
cooperation and to the shaping of project designs within the respective
programmes. Finally, the article is related to the efforts of the author
to stimulate European exchanges and cross-project collaboration within
European VET-related research. In this context special emphasis has been
given on trans-cultural dialogue and knowledge sharing on the contribution
of research to VET-related developmental initiatives.
|