| Project
|
Coordinator:
WIFO
/ Sabine Manning
Duration:
December 1997 to April 2000
Support:
European Commission (Contract No: D/971/12007/PI/III.3.a/CONT )
Cooperation:
LEONARDO Multiplier-effect project SPES-NET |
| Basis |
The
multiplier project is based on the LEONARDO S&A project INTEQUAL
(REPORT I of the first period), which investigated innovative schemes of
qualifications at upper secondary level with a dual orientation towards
employment and higher education (dual qualifications). The INTEQUAL
REPORT I, comparing the schemes of seven European countries, produced
results of substantial relevance for the development of VET in Europe,
in particular regarding the cohesion of VET policies:
-
It gave
clear evidence of the potential which dual qualifications offer for improving
the quality and prestige of VET. Despite the great diversity of national
patterns, dual qualifications show an increasing similarity in basic characteristics,
e.g the growing importance of integrated forms of vocational and general
education and of action-orientated learning such as project work.
-
By identifying
relevant similarities between schemes of dual qualification, the investigation
revealed that there are abundant opportunities for the exchange and transfer
of experience across schemes and national systems.
-
Furthermore,
the study provided a fully developed methodological pattern of comparative
analysis applicable beyond the range of countries included in the investigation.
|
| Aim |
In
aiming at a significant multiplier effect in DUOQUAL, the comparative analysis,
so far representing seven schemes in Northern and Western Europe, will
be applied to a new (i.e. additional) group of seven countries, with a
focus on partners from Central and Southern Europe.
This
extension will allow for a transfer of established experience and, at the
same time, a more differentiated analysis of the diversity of the schemes
and their complex relation to the national framework of VET. By covering
all major regions and types of VET in Europe, the results of the comparative
analysis will gain considerably in relevance and applicability. As the
main outcome of this analysis, a set of national conclusions will be provided
for advising policy makers and practitioners in VET.
|
| Approach |
The
basic approach in analysis is to apply the design of the INTEQUAL
study to a new group of countries, thereby transferring established experience,
acquiring new evidence and achieving a higher level of comparison and conclusions
relevant for dissemination.
As
an overall structure of analysis, the schemes are grouped according to
the basic types of VET, which were established in the original study:
Apprenticeship:
Germany, Norway, Switzerland
Full-time
basic: England, Sweden Greece, Finland, Portugal
Full-time
specialised: France, Netherlands, Czech Republic
Part-time
further education: Austria, Denmark, Italy
The analysis
of the national schemes of dual qualification, following the pattern of
the INTEQUAL REPORT I but
centred on the new countries, will concentrate on five major points:
-
the national
framework of economic, social and educational change, in which the schemes
are placed, including the competitive position within Europe;
-
the major
features of the schemes in the context of the national systems of education,
in particular with regard to the balance between opening up access to higher
education and strengthening the vocational education sector;
-
the educational
concepts underlying the schemes, such as the relation between theoretical/knowledge-based
learning and experiential/work-based learning and key skills - in relation
to their different national routes;
-
the organisational
implications of integrating general and vocational education, considering
methods of cooperation between the traditionally contrasting administrative
and financial systems;
-
the evidence
of success of the schemes, in terms of both participation and satisfaction
respecting the schemes themselves and their impact on mainstream vocational
education.
The analytical
work is based on available documents and studies, personal involvement
in the monitoring and evaluation of pilot projects or reforms, empirical
observation and interviews. An important part of the project, again focusing
on the seven new countries, will be individual workshops at national or
regional level, inviting experts, policy makers and practitioners for a
joint discussion of national schemes in the light of European comparison.
The workshops will stimulate conclusions to be drawn for national policies
in VET. These conclusions will be set out both in the mother tongue and
in English. |
| Dissemination |
Special
measures for disseminating the results of the comparative analysis will
be applied. These include:
-
producing
a comparative study covering all 14 countries to be published in cooperation
with CEDEFOP;
-
presenting
up-to-date conclusions for national educational policies in a final study
related to schemes of dual qualification in all countries involved. This
will be accomplished by specific dissemination activities within the individual
countries.
Further
dissemination is envisaged at the joint workshops with the SPES-NET
partnership.
UPDATE: Major results of the partnership
project are being made available in the Knowledge
Base. |
| Impact |
It
is anticipated that the results of DUOQUAL will have an impact on
-
national
educational policies, by putting the individual schemes in a broader European
context and identifying alternative patterns and experience;
-
national
curriculum development, by stimulating the transfer of innovative ideas
and expertise;
-
the evolution
of transnational projects, by suggesting issues of innovative skill development
related
to dual qualifications.
A wide
range of beneficiaries will be addressed by DUOQUAL via publications, national
workshops and international conferences. The beneficiaries will include
educational policy makers and social partners in VET at national and international
levels; educational experts and researchers in the individual countries
and the growing European networks; and educational practitioners, including
teachers and students. |