Active learning
and ageing at work
New visions and
opportunities for older workers in the Nordic countries
Tarja
Tikkanen, Bernharður Guðmundsson, Leif Emil Hansen, Susanna Paloniemi,
Hanne Randle & Jon Sandvik
Copenhagen:
Nordic Council of Ministers.
2008
Soon
available at http://www.norden.org/pub/
SUMMARY
In
this report we have been looking at the situation of older workers from
the perspective of
lifelong
learning in the Nordic countries. Older workers in the Nordic countries
(OWN) is one
of
the networks within the Nordic Network for Adult Learning (NVL) supported
by the
Nordic
Council. The task of the OWN is to promote discussion on employability
of older
workers
and the opportunities available for them. Nordic values and traditions,
the principles
of
welfare state, learner-centred adult education, democracy, and equality,
are the basis of this
work.
The network aims to challenge long established mindsets, as well as the
policy and
practice
concerning working and learning in later life. We take a comprehensive
approach
underlining
older workers’ ability and willingness as well as opportunity to work longer.
We
wish
to promote an overall wellbeing among older workers by advocating for more
choices
and opportunities in working, learning, and ageing. To this end we need
to
confront
stigmatising stereotypes and identify prevailing ambivalences, and, above
all, to
expand
the existing discussion by bringing forward the voice and initiative of
older workers
themselves.
This means that a strong ethical foundation of mutual respect and
acknowledgement
between all the parties concerned is the basis of the network. As we grow
older,
we become more different than similar.
The
review presented in this report shows that, on one hand, the values and
practice of the
working
life and the educational systems in the Nordic countries provide frames,
which are
supportive
also for the older workers to remain active in working life and beyond.
This view
becomes
especially pronounced when seen against the situation in the other European
countries.
On the other hand, the Nordic model shows weaknesses in its crucial aspects,
such
as
in regards inclusion and equal opportunity among those with low-resources,
both in the
area
of working life and education. This suggests that there are some structural-functional
hindrances,
which we need to work with. However, an equally, if not more powerful factor
is
in
play: the long-established socio-cultural-cognitive mindsets in thinking
about the equation
of
working, learning and ageing.
At
the end of the report we make recommendations for further actions needed.
We call the
parliaments,
governments, and local politicians, as well as employers and social partners,
but
also
education and training providers to provide optimal frames for flexible
and age-friendly
policies
and practice. Such a perspective is not completely new. Calls on this line
have also
been
made by, for example, the OECD (2006), European Commission (2006), and
Cedefop
(Tikkanen
& Nyhan, 2006). In this discussion OWN network wishes to bring forward
the
Nordic
dimension with its rather distinctive, positive characteristics.
Back
to top |